contact us Skip to main content

THE LEARNING LAWS

Search This Blog

Featured post

Case analysis of Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1891-4) All ER Rep. 127

by THE LEARNING LAWS

Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

contact us

by THE LEARNING LAWS

Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

Comments

New comments are not allowed.

INTERNSHIPS DETAILS FOR LAW STUDENTS

Internship Opportunity at Ab Initio Legal, Delhi [2 Positions; 4-6 Weeks] (Stipend Rs. 5k): Apply Now!
Internship Programme at Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC): Applications Open

Popular Posts

Subhas Chandra Das Mushib v. Ganga Prasad Das Mushib, AIR 1967 SC 878( CASE STUDY )

Subhas Chandra Das Mushib v. Ganga Prasad Das Mushib, AIR 1967 SC 878 Subhas Chandra Das vs Ganga Prasad Das Mushib Case is of Indian Contract Act, 1872 which explains the concept of Undue Influence. In the case of Undue influence, the contract is voidable, as consent given by the party is not free and the party has the power to avoid the contract. To prove that the contract is induced by undue influence than certain condition needs to be fulfilled which are given under the same section. BENCH Mitter, G.K, Wanchoo, K.N, Shelat, J.M RELEVANT PROVISIONS Section 16 states the definition of ‘ Undue Influence ’ under the Indian Contract Act , 1872. Section 101 states the concept of ‘Burden of Proof ‘ under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Subhas Chandra Das Mushib v. Ganga Prasad Das Mushib, AIR 1967 SC 878 was a landmark case heard by the Supreme Court of India that dealt with issues of property rights and inheritance in a Hindu family dispute. The case set important ...

Meghalaya High Court Quashes POCSO Appeal: Examining a False Allegation by a 16-Year-Old

Introduction : In a recent ruling, the Meghalaya High Court made headlines by quashing an appeal under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The case involved a 16-year-old girl who had falsely accused her boyfriend of a POCSO offense. This decision has sparked discussions about the misuse of the POCSO Act and the repercussions it can have on genuine victims, accused individuals, and the credibility of the legal system. In this blog post, we will delve into the details surrounding this case and explore the implications it carries. Key Points: 1. The POCSO Act and its significance: The POCSO Act was enacted to protect children from sexual offenses and provide them with a safe environment. It aims to ensure justice for victims and holds those responsible accountable for their actions. The Act carries strict penalties for offenders to deter such heinous crimes against minors. 2. The false allegation case: In this particular case, a 16-year-old girl falsely accused h...

Case analysis of Kanhaiya Lal Aggarwal v. Union of India (AIR 2002 SC 2766)

Kanhaiya Lal Aggarwal v. Union of India, AIR 2002 SC 2766 INTRODUCTION Kanhaiya Lal Aggarwal v. Union of India highlights the scope of judicial review of administrative acts and the liberty of States to act on civil contracts and also explains the concept of liability arising therefrom. Honourable Justice S. Rajendra Babu and Honourable Justice P. Venkatarama Reddi. ARTICLES 12,14, 32, 226, AND 298 OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION PROVISION APPLIED IN THIS CASE The main concepts involved in Kanhaiya Lal Agrawal v. UOI The liability of the state arising out of contracts. Freedom of government in exercising its administrative functions relating to tenders and commercial contracts. The scope of judicial review of administrative action in tenders and commercial contracts. FACTS OF THE ...

Powered by Blogger